| Table 3. Drug Market Indicators by County | |||||
| Maricopa County | Pima County | ||||
| Obtained Methamphetamine in past 30 days* | 26.7% | 10.4% | |||
| Characteristics of Cash Transactions | |||||
| Paid cash for methamphetamine in past 30 days | 59.0% | 57.3% | |||
| Cash only | 89.4% | 89.6% | |||
| Cash and something else | 10.6% | 10.4% | |||
| Bought directly | 85.7% | 84.4% | |||
| Bought indirectly from someone working with a dealer | 37.1% | 30.8% | |||
| Bought indirectly from someone not working with a dealer | 62.9% | 69.2% | |||
| Bought in own neighborhood | 47.1% | 54.7% | |||
| Unable to purchase in past 30 days | 25.3% | 31.3% | |||
| Unable because no dealer was available | 29.8% | 25.0% | |||
| Unable because dealer did not have drug | 44.4% | 42.9% | |||
| Unable because dealer did not have acceptable quality | 19.2% | 21.4% | |||
| Unable because of police activity | 6.6% | 10.7% | |||
| Source | |||||
| Regular Source | 62.5% | 62.8% | |||
| Occasional Source | 25.6% | 24.4% | |||
| New Source | 11.9% | 12.8% | |||
| Method used to contact source | |||||
| Pager | 7.3% | 1.1% | |||
| Telephone | 44.0% | 51.7% | |||
| Went to Apartment/House | 30.0% | 31.0% | |||
| With person already | 9.1% | 9.2% | |||
| Other | 9.6% | 7.0% | |||
| Type of place where methamphetamine bought | |||||
| Apartment/house | 77.1% | 74.4% | |||
| Public building/street/outdoor | 20.8% | 23.3% | |||
| Other | 2.1% | 2.3% | |||
| Unit type | |||||
| Gram | 56.9% | 62.4% | |||
| Ounce | 28.9% | 25.9% | |||
| Other | 14.2% | 11.7% | |||
| Amount spent (most recent transaction) | 135.1 | 213.49 | |||
| % for self (most recent transaction) ** | 69.4% | 61.6% | |||
| Number of times acquired on that day | 1.25 | 1.10 | |||
| Number of days acquired in last 7 days | 2.20 | 2.28 | |||
| Number of days acquired in last 30 days** | 9.56 | 9.14 | |||
| Number of persons bought in last days | 2.00 | 1.97 | |||
| * p < .05 (chi-square test for difference in frequency between counties) | |||||
| ** p < .05 (t-test of difference between means) | |||||
| Table 3. Drug Market Indicators by County (cont.) | |||||
| Maricopa County | Pima County | ||||
| Characteristics of Non-Cash Transactions | |||||
| Obtained methamphetamine without paying cash in past 30 days | 76.9% | 75.0% | |||
| How obtained | |||||
| On Credit | 6.4% | 5.6% | |||
| Fronted to sell | 5.5% | 8.8% | |||
| Trade | 6.4% | 9.6% | |||
| Gift | 56.9% | 45.6% | |||
| Other | 24.8% | 30.4% | |||
| Method used to contact source | |||||
| Telephone | 22.7% | 23.0% | |||
| Went to Apartment/house | 21.1% | 19.7% | |||
| With person already | 38.4% | 38.5% | |||
| Other | 17.8% | 18.8% | |||
| Unit type | |||||
| Gram | 58.5% | 53.7% | |||
| Ounce | 18.8% | 26.9% | |||
| Other | 22.7% | 19.4% | |||
| % for self (most recent transaction) | 71.8% | 71.9% | |||
| Number of times acquired on that day | 1.27 | 1.31 | |||
| Number of days acquired in last 7 days | 2.03 | 1.82 | |||
| Number of days acquired in last 30 days | 7.45 | 6.85 | |||
| * p < .05 (chi-square test for difference in frequency between counties) | |||||