PME-NA XXII
Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psycology of Mathematics Education
Tucson, Arizona October 7-10, 2000
Home | Theme | Events | Goals | Program | Pre-Registration | Proposals | Conference | Travel Info | Membership
Table of contents:
Committee
Conference
Theme
Schedule
of Events
Goals
of PME
Scientific
Program
Proposals
Conference Site
Travel
Arizona
Organizers/Advisors
More
Info
Membership
For Reviewer
Registration
Form ( pdf format )
Conference
Papers
PROPOSALS
Revision
of Proposal Review Criteria for PME-NA Annual Meeting The 1999-2000
PME-NA Steering Committee decided to revise the Proposal Review Criteria
to better distinguish review criteria for empirical and theoretical proposals.
Empirical Proposals present a study based in data and draw conclusions
thereform. These proposals will continue to be evaluated using recent
criteria including (1) significance of question, (2) relationship to PME-NA
goals, (3) theoretical framework, (4) mode of inquiry, (5) rigor of analysis,
(6) interpretation of results, and (7) quality of writing. Questions to
consider as you write or read these proposals are as follows: Does the
study address an significant question? Is the study aligned with the goals
of PME-NA? Is the study framed by theory? Does the study employ a methodology
appropriate for the question it investigates? Does the proposal present
data analyses thereof and are the analyses supported by the data? Does
the proposal provide claims, conclusions, or suggestions that are based
in its data? Does the proposal display high quality writing?
Theoretical Proposals present a principled analysis of issues, drawing connections among current explanatory frameworks and extending them in important ways. These proposals will be evaluated with revised criteria including (1) significance of issues, (2) relationship to PME-NA goals, (3) analysis of issues, (4) implications for theory, (5) implications for practice, and (6) quality of writing. Questions to consider when writing or reading these proposals: Does the proposal address issues that are important for mathematics education? Does the proposal offer a penetrating analysis of the issues or extend our understanding of them? Does the proposal build stronger connections within a theory or among theories? Does the theoretical discussion have implications for practice? Does the proposal display high quality writing? Further information will be sent to reviewers.
Information
on Proposal Submission
Proposals
for research reports, short orals, or working/discussion groups must be
submitted or postmarked by January 21, 2000. Proposals may be submitted
by mail using the proposal forms (see below) or electronically at http://www.west.asu.edu/cmw/pme/.
Electronic submissions must be sent as MS Word documents and must comply
with and include all the information requested on the Proposal Submission
Form (PME-NA@mail.ed.arizona.edu). Poster session proposal forms will
be mailed with the second announcement. Poster session proposals must
be submitted by June 9, 2000. If a proposal is accepted, it is the responsibility
of the person whose name appears as the presenting author to be a registered
participant at the Annual Meeting.
Dates For Submission of Proposals and Papers
January 21, 2000 Deadline for submission of proposals for research reports, short orals, working/discussion groups. April 2000 Notification of acceptance and Second Announcement mailed. June 9, 2000 Poster presentation proposals due. Deadline for submission of research reports andshort orals for the proceedings.
Proposals Forms:
- Research Report or Short Oral Report Proposal Submission Form
- Discussion Group or Working Group Proposal Submission Form