MIXED METAPHORS: UNDERGRADUATES DO CALCULUS OUT
LOUD
Eric Hsu
University
of Texas-Austin
Erichsu@math.utexas.edu
Micheal
Oehrtman
University
of Texas-Austin
Oehrtman.utexas.edu
We describe our findings
from an exploratory study on the use of metaphors in learning calculus among
college freshmen. By metaphor, we mean
any set of cognitive tools used as a referent system to assist in understanding
and employing a mathematical concept. What are the core metaphors that students
use to comprehend and work with essential calculus concepts? How are these metaphors used and how do they
develop?
During the spring
semester of 2000, we conducted task-based interviews with 15 students enrolled
in a second semester calculus course at a major southwestern public university. Eight interviews, lasting two to two and a
half hours each, were conducted with pairs of students. The students worked on a problem dealing
with position, velocity and acceleration and reflected on their work and what
difficulties other students of their level would have. The interviews were audio-taped, and
transcripts were analyzed for emergent themes.
In our initial analysis,
we identified the six most common uses of base metaphors labeling them as
“slope,” “rate of change,” “automobile,” “motion detector,” “motion on the
graph,” and “vertical motion,” and observed the following: first, most students
alternately employed two or three of these metaphors but rarely attempted to do
so at the same time; second, each metaphor came with a corresponding set of
language use, signs, and images; third, their mode of analysis changed
consistently with the metaphor they employed.
Often, this would result in the students either unknowingly obtaining
contradicting results or creating unnecessary confusion due to cross-talk
between similar signs of different metaphors.
This was a planning
study for a large-scale study in fall 2000 with over a hundred students in a
first-year calculus course. We will
track the development of their use of mathematical metaphors in weekly written
work, tests, in-class “snapshots,” and interviews.